Skip to content
Atlas of Computational Cell Reprogramming

← Methods

L0 · Target-feature discovery D

CellCartographer

Appleton E, Tao J, Liu S, Glass C, Fonseca G, Church G

2025 · Cell reports

The creation of induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) has enabled scientists to explore the function, mechanisms, and differentiation processes of many types of cells.

Abstract

From the original paper, Cell reports · PubMed

The creation of induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) has enabled scientists to explore the function, mechanisms, and differentiation processes of many types of cells. One of the fastest and most efficient approaches is transcription factor (TF) over-expression. However, finding the right combination of TFs to over-express to differentiate iPSCs directly into other cell types is a difficult task. Here, we describe a machine-learning (ML) pipeline, called CellCartographer, that uses chromatin accessibility and transcriptomics data to design multiplex TF pooled-screening experiments for cell-type conversions that then may be iteratively refined. We validate this method by differentiating iPSCs into twelve cell types at low efficiency in preliminary screens and iteratively refine our TF combinations to achieve high-efficiency differentiation for six of these cell types in <6 days. Finally, we functionally characterize iPSC-derived cytotoxic T cells (iCytoTs), regulatory T cells (iTregs), type II astrocytes (iAstIIs), and hepatocytes (iHeps) to validate functionally accurate differentiation.

Summary

Editorial summary pending review by the maintainer. The paper's own abstract appears above; the Atlas summary in the maintainer's voice will explain how CellCartographer relates to the cross-modality inverse-design framework of the review.

Why this level

Level 0 because the method scores features against a target/background contrast without modelling an intervention uu — the output is a ranked list of candidate identity determinants, not an intervention whose effect has been computed. Representation family is signature / state-matching. Cited in §3.1 of the review. Editorial rationale pending review by the maintainer.

Classification

Level
L0
Representation
Signature / state-matching
Modalities
D
Intervention
Transcription factors
Framework
Information-theoretic

Software

Reproducibility
3 of 4
FAIR4RS
0 of 5

Last audited 2026-05-24

Citation

Appleton E et al. (2025). Machine-guided cell-fate engineering., Cell reports.

DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2025.115726

PMID: 40382774

BibTeX
@article{cellcartographer2025,
  title  = {Machine-guided cell-fate engineering.},
  author = {Appleton E et al.},
  year   = {2025},
  journal = {Cell reports},
  pmid = {40382774},
  doi  = {10.1016/j.celrep.2025.115726}
}