Section 5 of the review
Reproducibility dashboard
Interactive summaries of code availability, practical rerunnability, and FAIR4RS compliance for the 57 reviewed methods (aligned with Figure 3 in the companion paper). Charts and the table below share the same filters; criteria are defined in the scoring rubric.
Audit summaries
Charts reflect the current filters.
Code availability & reruns
Stacked counts by group: public and runnable (4/4), public but partial, or no code / offline at audit.
FAIR4RS distribution
Among methods with accessible code only. Vertical tick marks the ≥ 3/5 threshold (companion paper Figure 3B).
57 methods
| Method | Class | Modality | REPRODUCIBILITY SCORE | FAIR4RS SCORE | Software | Audited |
|---|
No methods match the current filters. Try clearing filters or broadening your search.
Scoring rubric
Each method is scored on two complementary axes whose sub-criteria are applied uniformly across the 57 reviewed methods. Per-method audit data lives on each method page.
Reproducibility (0-4)
Reproducibility score (0 to 4): one point each for public tool, README with instructions, bundled example data, and step-by-step tutorial. N/A when no accessible code or web tool at audit. A score of 4/4 is treated as independently runnable.
FAIR4RS (0-5)
FAIR4RS score (0 to 5): OSI-approved license, versioned releases, archival DOI, environment specification, and citation metadata. N/A when no accessible code or web tool at audit. A score of at least 3 of 5 is treated as crossing the FAIR4RS threshold.
Archival materials
The frozen audit matrix for the 57 reviewed methods is in Supporting Information S3. Rerunnable scripts and archived outputs are deposited at acceptance.
The full PDF, DOI, and supplementary tables will be linked here when the article is published. Reproduction materials will be archived on Zenodo and GitHub at acceptance.