Skip to content
Atlas of Computational Cell Reprogramming

← Methods

L3 · Explicit model-based inverse intervention P

cSTAR

Rukhlenko OS, Halasz M, Rauch N, Zhernovkov V, Prince T, Wynne K, Maher S, Kashdan E, MacLeod K, Carragher NO, Kolch W, Kholodenko BN

2022 · Nature

Understanding cell state transitions and purposefully controlling them is a longstanding challenge in biology.

Abstract

From the original paper, Nature · PubMed

Understanding cell state transitions and purposefully controlling them is a longstanding challenge in biology. Here we present cell state transition assessment and regulation (cSTAR), an approach for mapping cell states, modelling transitions between them and predicting targeted interventions to convert cell fate decisions. cSTAR uses omics data as input, classifies cell states, and develops a workflow that transforms the input data into mechanistic models that identify a core signalling network, which controls cell fate transitions by influencing whole-cell networks. By integrating signalling and phenotypic data, cSTAR models how cells manoeuvre in Waddington's landscape1 and make decisions about which cell fate to adopt. Notably, cSTAR devises interventions to control the movement of cells in Waddington's landscape. Testing cSTAR in a cellular model of differentiation and proliferation shows a high correlation between quantitative predictions and experimental data. Applying cSTAR to different types of perturbation and omics datasets, including single-cell data, demonstrates its flexibility and scalability and provides new biological insights. The ability of cSTAR to identify targeted perturbations that interconvert cell fates will enable designer approaches for manipulating cellular development pathways and mechanistically underpinned therapeutic interventions.

Summary

Editorial summary pending review by the maintainer. The paper's own abstract appears above; the Atlas summary in the maintainer's voice will explain how cSTAR relates to the cross-modality inverse-design framework of the review.

Why this level

Level 3 because candidate interventions enter an explicit forward operator FθuF_{\theta_u} and the predicted post-intervention outcome is what scores each candidate. Representation family is executable intervention model. Cited in §3.4 of the review. Editorial rationale pending review by the maintainer.

Classification

Level
L3
Representation
Executable intervention model
Modalities
P
Intervention
Transcription factors
Framework
Boolean network

Software

Reproducibility
1 of 4
FAIR4RS
0 of 5

Last audited 2026-05-24

Citation

Rukhlenko OS et al. (2022). Control of cell state transitions., Nature.

DOI: 10.1038/s41586-022-05194-y

PMID: 36104561

BibTeX
@article{cstar2022,
  title  = {Control of cell state transitions.},
  author = {Rukhlenko OS et al.},
  year   = {2022},
  journal = {Nature},
  pmid = {36104561},
  doi  = {10.1038/s41586-022-05194-y}
}